Comments on: Mitt Romney: Constitutionally Confused

By: Realist

Realist — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:37:25 +0000

Said Mitt of the health bill “I’ll see ya
“We’re better off than North Ko-ree-ya
“I’ve said all along
“You’re doing it wrong
“Because it was not my idee-ya.”

By: Rollo_Greb

Rollo_Greb — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:57:54 +0000

Individual mandates aren’t great
Unless they’re required in your state
Mittens flip-flops so much
Cause he’s so out of touch
That his health plan becomes his own fate.

By: Mark Lysgaard

Mark Lysgaard — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:10:55 +0000

Individual mandates are great
But hypocrisy just can’t wait.
If not for his smile
And endless denial,
Mitt’s forehead needs a new plate. ;-)

By: Thebes

Thebes — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:20:59 +0000

So, the “Individual Mandate”, aka protection money, is constitutional because Mitt Romney is a two faced jerk???

It is not, no place in the US Constitution was the Federal government of these United States given, by the people, the power to FORCE the purchase of a corporate product or service. The constitution outlines ALL powers given to the Federal government, this isn’t one of them so it is reserved for the States or the People. I suppose that under the federal constitution a State might still have the power, in it’s own constitution given by its own people, to compel a purchase, however this seems to me a basic violation of human rights.

Live Free or Die

(by the way I am a Democrat, or at least I was until the Obama Pelosi regime gained power, and POWER is all they are interested in)